Monday, August 26, 2013
Biggest challenge yet faced by the state of Singapore
Letter to Kishore Mahbubani from Derek John
Potter,
a 64 year old English-born permanent resident living in
Singapore since 1981.
ATTENTION: KISHORE MAHBUBANIDear SirI am very pleased to see that you’ve started this regular much-needed column. It shouldprovide a valuable sounding board for opinions on what may be the biggest challenge yetfaced by the state of Singapore. I feel qualified to make some comments, albeit subjective,being a sixty four year old English-born permanent resident, who has enjoyed spendinghalf his life, living and working in Singapore. I have a strong interest in Southeast Asiaand after retiring from the oil industry I returned to university and graduated with twomaster’s degrees from the NUS Department of Southeast Asian Studies.Looking back over my time in Singapore I feel that the quality of life improved up untilabout the early 1990s, but since then has gradually declined. It is now clear to me that themain causes of this are the stress and unhappiness resulting from too-rapid change, togetherwith the inexorable reduction of physical living space. Specifically, the main issues are:cultural change brought by hurried large-scale immigration; a noticeable rise in inequality;and overcrowding reaching a psychological tipping point. I would also like to emphasizethat for twenty four years I was married into a well-established Hokkien Chinese family,and as such did not live most of my life in an ‘ex-pat cocoon’. Instead I would like to thinkthat I became reasonably well versed in the culture and thinking of the majority of ChineseSingaporeans.Any reasonable person who reads the recent White Paper would have to agree that in pureeconomic terms, it makes perfect sense. In the long run Singapore’s negative demographicswill in one way or another cause the eventual collapse of the state as we know it today. Theproblem is that most Singaporeans have existential day-to-day needs that do not resonatewith such a long time frame. They and their families have to live their lives now, today,at the present moment.When I came to Singapore in 1981 it had a strong Southeast Asian culture, where most peoplecould speak basic Malay along with their mother tongue, and there was a sense of the region’shistory and its inter-connectedness. Now the culture has changed to one that seems much moremainland Chinese oriented, where you need to speak mandarin to communicate with mostservice industry people.The resentment of Singapore citizens to such a rapid influx of culturally different peopleis entirely understandable. It is no wonder that so many now feel alienated in their owncountry. However, one can also appreciate the government’s dilemma, when realisingthat they urgently needed immigrants, as well as maintain a Chinese majority, they wereforced to turn to mainland China. While Overseas Chinese, particularly from Malaysiaor Indonesia, would have been much more suitable, there were obviously insufficient ofthem willing to settle in Singapore and make up the shortfall. Caucasians could have alsobeen enticed to come in sufficient numbers, but once they had built up a critical mass,would have become problematic politically, and begun agitating for greater freedoms.Similarly if Indians or Malays had been brought in large numbers, they would havebegun to lobby hard for their own communities and challenged the present Chinese rulingestablishment. In this respect one could also point to Singapore’s limited political spacein causing resentment, but providing its economy continues to grow steadily and the rewardsare better spread around, this should not become a critical issue for years to come. A severeeconomic downturn would of course test the present structure of government to the limits.The problem of rising inequality is something the government has recognised and rightlydecided to prioritise before the mood in the heartlands gets really ugly. Judging by thepresent number of expensive shops and restaurants, Singapore would seem to have anabundance of rich people. This creates much peer pressure and envy. With its mega-casinosand F1 motor racing, Singapore is now a ‘ World City ’, and the startling rise in conspicuousconsumption by the wealthy flies very much in the faces of ordinary citizens. And whilemost people are now resigned to never owning a car in Singapore, for them to never owntheir own homes would be too much to take.It is well within the government’s capability to redress the problem of inequality and makeeveryone feel they will share in Singapore’s prosperity. A much more intractable problemis the psychological effect of overcrowding, which has resulted in a feeling of living in aconcrete jungle, despite the government’s valiant attempts at greening wherever it can.We now have MRT trains arriving every few minutes, packed to the gills with people,even in the middle of the day. Singapore now feels like there are simply far too manypeople living here. There seems to be nowhere to get away from them all, even for justa few hours. And yes, one could tackle the causeway traffic or take a flight or ferry to anearby country, but not on a regular enough basis to make a lasting day-to-day difference.There is now the feeling of being trapped in an urban nightmare and the knowledge thatthe population is set to rise even further is obviously going to trigger more anxiety.I freely admit to being nostalgic for the lifestyle of the 1980s, before so much of Singaporechanged and when the population was half of what it is today. In those days you could easilydrive around the island and visit many different and distinct neighbourhoods. It was stillpossible to roam through large areas of jungle and coastline to find traditional kampongs,and visit inhabited offshore islands such as Pulau Seking. One could even sail into Malaysianwaters without having to check in and out of immigration. I was reminded of this during arecent visit to the village of Kong Kong in Johor, where we used to boat to regularly. Therewas water skiing at Pulau Ubin, and afterwards delicious seafood to be enjoyed at the Punggolwaterside restaurants. It was nice to feel contented eating good Asian food in local eatingplaces and not be pressured into spending a fortune in the hundreds of international high-endbars and restaurants one finds nowadays.There is obviously no going back to those days, but it is sad that most Singaporeans will neverget to do any of these things in their new ultra-modern country. So much of the former senseof space and unique character has been lost. Now everything feels too controlled and that vitalpsychological perception of at least having a little autonomy has gone. Cultivated parklandsare fine but do not satisfy a deeper longing for freedom. The fact that there is almost nowhereon the island that you don’t have to pay for parking is just one aspect of this sense of constraint.It is now clear that the majority of Singaporeans have satisfied most of their basic materialneeds, and have now moved on to seeking fulfilment and self-actualisation, as was predictedby Maslow’s well known model of human aspiration. But unfortunately for the government,this poses a problem that has no quick and ready solutions. These higher human needs requirespace and freedom, both physical and mental. And this is very difficult to satisfy in the pressurecooker, hot-house that Singapore has become, where the treadmill feels as if it is turning everfaster. Unable to satisfy these emerging desires, citizens are going to continue to feel unhappieras the years go by, even though they live in the safest, best organised and most efficient city inSoutheast Asia.It is going to be very difficult, but the government must find a way of improving thequality of life with acceptable population densities, in the way countries like Switzerlandand Scandinavia have successfully done. This, as the government has recognised, willrequire massive improvements in levels of education and productivity for virtually theentire working population, and needs tackling on an unprecedented scale. Because theymust now realise that bringing in more and more immigrants is creating very seriousproblems. Anyway, I am greatly looking forward to your future articles and the feedbackthey will surely generate.Best wishesDerek John Potter (S2617998Z)